Want to track your MER?
Try Incendium

Close X

Metrics

/

MER

MER

(Marketing Efficiency Ratio)

Marketing Efficiency Ratio (MER), also known as blended ROAS, measures the overall efficiency of your marketing spend in driving revenue. Unlike campaign-specific metrics, MER provides a complete view of how all marketing investments collectively impact revenue.

Table of Contents
Understanding MERHow to Calculate MERWhat’s Considered a Healthy MER?MER FAQ
Learning more?
Apply what you know in a platform that measures up!
Try Incendium

Understanding MER

MER serves as a top-level health metric, offering a quick snapshot of overall marketing efficiency. By setting and tracking a target MER, businesses can gauge whether they are on course to achieve their revenue goals and adjust their strategies accordingly. Marketing Efficiency Ratio complements more granular metrics, providing context for individual campaign performances within the broader marketing landscape.
‍
The key difference between MER and ROAS lies in granularity: ROAS focuses on revenue generated by a specific advertising campaign or channel divided by the cost of that particular activity, while MER looks at total revenue generated by all marketing efforts divided by total marketing spend across all channels and campaigns.

How to Calculate MER

MER = Total Revenue / Total Marketing Spend

Give it a go in our MER calculator!

MER Calculator

Marketing Efficiency Ratio:
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Calculation Example

Suppose your business aims for $80,000 in revenue next month with an average order value (AOV) of $160 and a target cost per acquisition (CPA) of $25. First, determine the number of orders needed:

Number of Orders = Revenue Goal / AOV = $80,000 / $160 = 500 orders

Next, estimate total marketing spend:

Total Marketing Spend = Number of Orders × CPA = 500 × $25 = $12,500

Finally, calculate target MER:

MER = Revenue Goal / Total Marketing Spend = $80,000 / $12,500 = 6.4

A target MER of 6.4 means you aim to generate $6.40 in revenue for every dollar spent on marketing.

What Tools Measure LTV:CAC Ratio?

You’d think calculating your LTV:CAC ratio would be straightforward — but surprisingly, most tools don’t make it easy.

This metric requires connecting costs with customer value over time — something very few platforms are built to do natively. Let’s break down where you can get this data, where the gaps are, and how Incendium fills them.

GA4: Can You Measure LTV:CAC?

Not easily. GA4 doesn’t show customer acquisition cost at all, and its Lifetime Value report is:

● Hidden under the “Explore” tab.

● Limited to revenue per user over a fixed period (e.g. 90 days).

● Lacking cohort-level breakdowns.

● Not connected to ad spend or margin data.

So while you can approximate parts of LTV in GA4, you’ll need spreadsheets to:

● Pull in ad costs from Google Ads, Meta, etc.

● Match spend to customer cohorts.

● Adjust for churn, returns, or contribution margin.

It’s doable — but; manual, error-prone, and not scalable.

❌ No CAC
❌ No contribution margin
❌ No retention-based LTV
❌ No channel or campaign granularity

Spreadsheet-Based Models

Many marketers and finance teams rely on custom spreadsheet models. These usually involve:

● Exporting revenue data from Shopify or GA4.

● Pulling in ad costs from platforms like Meta or Google.

● Matching acquisition dates to cohorts.

● Calculating LTV over time.

● Segmenting CAC by channel (if possible).

This can work for small teams — but:

● It's time-consuming.

● Easy to break as your business grows.

● Difficult to segment and troubleshoot.

● Hard to update frequently enough to make real-time decisions.

✅ Flexible
❌ Time-consuming
❌ Not real-time
❌ High error risk

Incendium: LTV:CAC Done Right

Incendium was built for this. It automatically connects:

● Ad platform spend (Google, Meta, TikTok, etc).

● Revenue and margins (from Shopify, Stripe, etc).

● Customer retention curves.

● Channel and campaign attribution.

● Cohort-based performance over time.

Then it presents your true LTV:CAC ratios — by channel, campaign, customer segment, and acquisition cohort — without the need for spreadsheets.

Whether you want to:

● See if paid search is actually profitable.

● Compare returning vs new customers.

● Measure payback periods.

● Or optimize toward high-LTV audiences.

…you’ll have it, instantly.

✅ Automated
✅ Channel + cohort breakdowns
✅ Margin-based LTV
✅ Attribution-integrated
✅ Real-time, self-updating

What’s Considered a Healthy MER?

A "healthy" MER depends on your business model, profit margins, and growth stage. While there's no universal benchmark, understanding what drives sustainable MER is critical:

● Profit margins determine viable MER floors. If your gross margin is 40%, you need MER above 2.5 just to break even on marketing spend (1 / 0.40 = 2.5). Businesses with 60% margins can operate profitably at MER of 1.67, while those with 25% margins need MER above 4.0 to stay solvent.

● Growth stage influences acceptable MER levels. Early-stage businesses prioritizing market share may accept MER of 2-3 while building brand awareness and customer base. Established businesses optimizing for profitability typically target MER of 4-8 depending on their margin structure and operational efficiency.

● Product type and pricing affect typical ranges. High-ticket items with longer sales cycles (furniture, electronics) often show MER of 3-5 due to higher acquisition costs and consideration periods. Fast-moving consumer goods with quick purchase decisions may achieve MER of 6-10 through efficient conversion and repeat purchases.

● Channel mix significantly impacts MER. Businesses heavily reliant on paid advertising typically see lower MER (2-4) than those with strong organic, email, and retention channels (5-10+). Diversified marketing approaches with cost-effective channels naturally improve blended MER.

● Seasonal variation is normal. MER typically peaks during high-converting periods (holidays, sales events) when conversion rates rise and CAC drops, then dips during slower periods. Track MER trends over time rather than fixating on single data points.

Tip: The most important benchmark is whether your MER supports profitable growth at your current margin structure. Calculate your breakeven MER, then target 50-100% above that level to ensure healthy profitability while maintaining growth capacity.

MER FAQ

How is MER different from ROAS?

What's the biggest mistake when using MER?

Should I include all marketing costs in MER or just ad spend?

How does MER account for returns and refunds?

Can MER be too high?

How should MER change as my business scales?

What Tools Measure LTV:CAC Ratio?

You’d think calculating your LTV:CAC ratio would be straightforward — but surprisingly, most tools don’t make it easy.

This metric requires connecting costs with customer value over time — something very few platforms are built to do natively. Let’s break down where you can get this data, where the gaps are, and how Incendium fills them.

GA4: Can You Measure LTV:CAC?

Not easily. GA4 doesn’t show customer acquisition cost at all, and its Lifetime Value report is:

● Hidden under the “Explore” tab.

● Limited to revenue per user over a fixed period (e.g. 90 days).

● Lacking cohort-level breakdowns.

● Not connected to ad spend or margin data.

So while you can approximate parts of LTV in GA4, you’ll need spreadsheets to:

● Pull in ad costs from Google Ads, Meta, etc.

● Match spend to customer cohorts.

● Adjust for churn, returns, or contribution margin.

It’s doable — but; manual, error-prone, and not scalable.

❌ No CAC
❌ No contribution margin
❌ No retention-based LTV
❌ No channel or campaign granularity

Spreadsheet-Based Models

Many marketers and finance teams rely on custom spreadsheet models. These usually involve:

● Exporting revenue data from Shopify or GA4.

● Pulling in ad costs from platforms like Meta or Google.

● Matching acquisition dates to cohorts.

● Calculating LTV over time.

● Segmenting CAC by channel (if possible).

This can work for small teams — but:

● It's time-consuming.

● Easy to break as your business grows.

● Difficult to segment and troubleshoot.

● Hard to update frequently enough to make real-time decisions.

✅ Flexible
❌ Time-consuming
❌ Not real-time
❌ High error risk

Incendium: LTV:CAC Done Right

Incendium was built for this. It automatically connects:

● Ad platform spend (Google, Meta, TikTok, etc).

● Revenue and margins (from Shopify, Stripe, etc).

● Customer retention curves.

● Channel and campaign attribution.

● Cohort-based performance over time.

Then it presents your true LTV:CAC ratios — by channel, campaign, customer segment, and acquisition cohort — without the need for spreadsheets.

Whether you want to:

● See if paid search is actually profitable.

● Compare returning vs new customers.

● Measure payback periods.

● Or optimize toward high-LTV audiences.

…you’ll have it, instantly.

✅ Automated
✅ Channel + cohort breakdowns
✅ Margin-based LTV
✅ Attribution-integrated
✅ Real-time, self-updating

What Tools Measure LTV:CAC Ratio?

You’d think calculating your LTV:CAC ratio would be straightforward — but surprisingly, most tools don’t make it easy.

This metric requires connecting costs with customer value over time — something very few platforms are built to do natively. Let’s break down where you can get this data, where the gaps are, and how Incendium fills them.

GA4: Can You Measure LTV:CAC?

Not easily. GA4 doesn’t show customer acquisition cost at all, and its Lifetime Value report is:

● Hidden under the “Explore” tab.

● Limited to revenue per user over a fixed period (e.g. 90 days).

● Lacking cohort-level breakdowns.

● Not connected to ad spend or margin data.

So while you can approximate parts of LTV in GA4, you’ll need spreadsheets to:

● Pull in ad costs from Google Ads, Meta, etc.

● Match spend to customer cohorts.

● Adjust for churn, returns, or contribution margin.

It’s doable — but; manual, error-prone, and not scalable.

❌ No CAC
❌ No contribution margin
❌ No retention-based LTV
❌ No channel or campaign granularity

Spreadsheet-Based Models

Many marketers and finance teams rely on custom spreadsheet models. These usually involve:

● Exporting revenue data from Shopify or GA4.

● Pulling in ad costs from platforms like Meta or Google.

● Matching acquisition dates to cohorts.

● Calculating LTV over time.

● Segmenting CAC by channel (if possible).

This can work for small teams — but:

● It's time-consuming.

● Easy to break as your business grows.

● Difficult to segment and troubleshoot.

● Hard to update frequently enough to make real-time decisions.

✅ Flexible
❌ Time-consuming
❌ Not real-time
❌ High error risk

Incendium: LTV:CAC Done Right

Incendium was built for this. It automatically connects:

● Ad platform spend (Google, Meta, TikTok, etc).

● Revenue and margins (from Shopify, Stripe, etc).

● Customer retention curves.

● Channel and campaign attribution.

● Cohort-based performance over time.

Then it presents your true LTV:CAC ratios — by channel, campaign, customer segment, and acquisition cohort — without the need for spreadsheets.

Whether you want to:

● See if paid search is actually profitable.

● Compare returning vs new customers.

● Measure payback periods.

● Or optimize toward high-LTV audiences.

…you’ll have it, instantly.

✅ Automated
✅ Channel + cohort breakdowns
✅ Margin-based LTV
✅ Attribution-integrated
✅ Real-time, self-updating

MER Related Reading

Improving Marketing Efficiency Ratio: Optimization Strategies
MER
Improving Marketing Efficiency Ratio: Optimization Strategies

Boost your MER with proven optimization strategies. Learn how to assess marketing performance, reallocate budgets effectively, improve conversion rates, and leverage cost-effective retention channels.

Marketing Efficiency Ratio: Avoiding Common Pitfalls
MER
Marketing Efficiency Ratio: Avoiding Common Pitfalls

Avoid critical MER mistakes that undermine growth. Learn how to balance efficiency with expansion, account for discounts properly, and use MER strategically alongside other metrics.